It's hard, looking at a website or a resume, to tell if the individual is good, or just good at making themselves look good on paper. I offer up these endorsements in an attempt to demonstrate that this is "the real deal".
A Review, by Glen Lewis of the Utah Java User's Group
New England Java User's Group did a review of the book shortly after the Utah JUG did.
DevX: JavaZone
did a review, too, and needless to say, it was a pretty nice one:
"It's fairly rare for a book to take an angle on a broad topic that yields
meaningful new insights. Ted Neward's Server-Based Java Programming is clearly
targeted at server-side development, but it doesn't tackle the topic in the
traditional Web-based, servlet, JSP, EJB, app server angle that you might
expect. Instead, it provides a look at critical techniques that developers
should know but are rarely communicated concisely or effectively. Reading this
book can make the difference between being a good Java programmer and an
excellent one. If you work frequently with Java, you owe it to yourself to
expand the breadth of your existing knowledge by reading this book." (More
at the review
webpage.)
Martin Crawford emailed me on
8 April 2001 to say:
"Just picked up your book last week. It has opened a whole new world of
understanding. Many books of this genre tend to spew out features and quick
code excerpts that do not necessarily improve ones software architecting
skills. Although this may bring many new developers up to speed it emphasizes a
quick hack mentality. Your book contains none of this, and has presented me
with exactly what I've been looking for solid server software design
solutions.
"Oh and it was very well written, which is also unusual in this genre.
"Many congratulations, and thanks. Please write more!!!"
(By the way, errata for the book can be found at http://www.javageeks.com/SBJP/errata.html.)
"It was absolutely great. I had never met anyone who knew the ins and outs of the languages like Java, C#, C++ as the instructor. I'm particularly impressed by the instructor (Ted) and the course material in general, especially since I've been incolved in designing courses on "COM and ActiveX programming" in the past."
"Even though C# was virtually new to the overriding majority of the
delegates to this event, Ted managed to emit the material in a very
comprehensive, yet light fashion. This was reflected in the array of dynamic
examples he constructed foreach of the more abstract ideas. These examples
often sealed the concept in my head.
"His attribute of exceptional patience manifested itself when I would try and
catch Ted privately during labs. Ted would never garbage a question from my
collection of GACky (oh, I mean wacky) questions, but rather would explain
until I finally understood.
"It is clear that Ted knows his stuff and enjoys teaching it."
(Can you count all the C# puns in this eval? :) --TKN)
"Ted was very knowledgable across platforms and languages and that helped in his explanations of where C# and .NET fit into our industry. Ted is also very enthusiastic, which helps in keeping attention. I also liked his occasional soapboxing."
"Actually, what was most of value was the instructor's own comments and opinions about the technology or trends within the industry. Too many times, instructors attempt to remain neutral without understanding that students really like well thought out positions or arguments about current issues."
"Ted is very enthused about this stuff. He likes Java and is able to share it. This makes for a better learning environment. He understands Java very well and can talk outside of the curriculium."
"He looks like he's a Harley Davidson fanatic but he sure knows his Java."
(My personal favorite. --TKN)
"Ted Neward, a C# and Java instructor for DevelopMentor, gave an excellent presentation on the comparison between Microsoft .NET and Java during the February 2001New England Java Users Group meeting. He started by describing some of the features of the .NET platform, complete with code examples to illustrate his points. Ted then went on to discuss the differences and similarities between the two platforms. During the meeting Ted was inundated with questions from the 300+ members attending the meeting. He did a good job fielding questions and keeping on track with the discussion, which is not an easy task. During the meeting Ted provided the audience with a fair and technically accurate assessment of both platforms, and also brought out many interesting points regarding the effects that the Microsoft .NET platform will have on Java and the industry as a whole, particularly with regard to competition and innovation. Ted is a great speaker, and kept the audience interested during the entire presentation. We look forward to having Ted speak on another topic at a future New England Java Users Group meeting."
Mark Richards"Ted came to PJUG (Portland Java Users Group) and presented an excellent talk on EJB (Enterprise Java Beans) to our largest meeting ever, nearly 60. He is very well informed and a clear and entertaining speaker. One of our best - we would be pleased to have him back again anytime."
Jon Batcheller